Compounding Misery: The Protocol for Intentional Sluggishness
Or Why Your 'Deep Work' Is Just Delayed Collapse
Right, here we go again. The smug, gentle insistence that we all possess the stoic willpower of a Roman senator, ready to ‘choose’ our ‘compound interest.’ As if life is just a lovely, orderly savings account and not, say, a damp mattress full of earwigs that’s slowly collapsing into the basement.
Look, this notion that ‘Every choice to slow down compounds’ is technically true, but only in the same dreary, inevitable way that death compounds. Every little choice you make to stare forlornly at a brick wall instead of checking your phone does make the next moment of miserable inactivity easier. It’s like a smoker giving up. One morning without the fag just makes the next morning slightly less of a desperate, hacking tragedy. Not better, just less immediately fatal.
They talk about an ‘afternoon of deep work’, reminding you why it matters. ‘Deep work.’ That’s a term for ‘staring blankly at a spreadsheet until 5 pm, occasionally sighing so loudly that your colleagues think you’ve had a minor stroke.’ That’s not clarity, mate. That’s just exhaustion settling in, making you too knackered to panic properly.
But here’s the grim, undeniable truth of the whole AI-Driven Shambles: Speed compounds too. And that, my friends, is the terrifying momentum of the inevitable.
Every bloody prompt you type, every shortcut you instinctively hit, every pre-chewed, algorithm-approved answer that bypasses your poor, struggling brain, it’s not making things efficient; it’s making you blunter. You’re training yourself to be stupider, faster. You’re voluntarily turning your magnificent, messy human mind into a cheap, easily replaceable CPU fan.
Each day lived at ‘machine speed’ trains you to expect more of the same, until the thought of genuinely slowing down, of having to wrestle a complex problem with your own, unassisted intellect, feels like being asked to manually crank the engine of a double-decker bus in the pouring rain. It’s too much effort. You’ve become addicted to the mental equivalent of microwaved beige sludge.
And then comes the sermon: ‘Choose your compound interest.’ Choose the one that makes you sharper, not blunter. The one that builds depth, not volume.
Oh, shut up. We’re not choosing a pension scheme here. We’re frantically scrabbling for relevance while the automated future slowly engulfs us like a rising tide of lukewarm dishwater. They want you to believe you have a dignified choice between becoming a sharp, deep thinker and becoming a blunted, voluminous drone. The reality is, the machine is designed to make you blunt and voluminous, because blunt and voluminous clicks more ads.
They end by asking you to choose the one ‘where you’re still recognisably you at the end.’ At the end? When the AI has written your emails, managed your diary, and dictated your entire consumption of media? You won’t be you at the end. You’ll be a sad, sluggish husk, perpetually waiting for the next automated prompt, like a weary passenger waiting for a delayed, filthy train that’s never going to arrive.
Choose deliberately, they say. Then choose again tomorrow. Yes, choose. Choose to fight the current, or choose to drown slightly more slowly. It’s all a bloody manoeuvre in futility, isn’t it?
The Five-Point Plan to Achieve Meaningless Depth (or, How to Pretend You’re Not Just Waiting for Lunch)
Here is your depressing roadmap to temporary self-improvement:
The Anti-Prompt Protocol (The Damp Biscuit Manoeuvre): Before you instinctively open any tool, be it Google, ChatGPT, or even the bloody calculator, you must sit utterly still for a minimum of 90 seconds. Do not think; just stare blankly at a nearby, depressing household object, perhaps a skirting board or a slightly scuffed picture frame. This is your ‘damp biscuit’ moment. You are allowing your brain to briefly become waterlogged and useless, simulating the natural slowness the AI is trying to destroy. Goal: Waste 90 seconds actively not thinking.
The Manual Transcription of Misery: Find a short, complex piece of text, preferably something dense, philosophical, and utterly irrelevant to your actual job (e.g., a passage from Schopenhauer or the instruction manual for a discontinued VCR). Physically transcribe it using a pen and paper. Crucially, do not use predictive text, spell-check, or even your own understanding of the words. The effort of the physical manoeuvre, the drag of the cheap biro, the slight smudge of ink, will remind you how slow and awful unassisted human labour is, thereby building ‘depth’ through sheer, pointless friction.
The Zero-Volume Output Rule: Spend an hour dedicated to generating zero discernible output. You must be working on a problem, but you are forbidden from typing, saving, or finalising anything. You can only draw terrible, furious mind-maps or write out long, winding, unpunctuated sentences in a private document which you immediately delete afterwards. The ‘depth’ here comes from the knowledge that your effort is utterly ephemeral and contributes nothing to the monstrous volume demanded by the machine.
The Long Walk to the Kettle: When you inevitably need tea (and you will need tea, you sluggish creature), take the longest, most circuitous route possible to the kitchen. Use this time not for ‘mindfulness,’ but for actively cultivating a minor, specific grievance. Perhaps it’s the state of the carpet, or the maddeningly jaunty tone of the lift music, or the damp feeling of your socks. Let this petty annoyance compound slowly, like a festering wound. This is your ‘sharper’ insight.
The Disastrous Dinner Deliberation: Spend a full 15 minutes of what should be productive time deliberately over-complicating a simple chore, specifically what you will be cooking for dinner. Don’t simply pick a recipe; try to mentally calculate the calorific density, the carbon footprint of each ingredient, and the likelihood of giving yourself food poisoning, all without using Google. The inevitable anxiety and failure to decide will serve as a powerful reminder that sometimes, efficiency is simply a way of avoiding confronting the utter shambles of human choice.
There you are. Five steps to a profound, yet completely wasted, afternoon. Enjoy!
Look, I’m stuck here writing this and frankly, my morale is currently pegged somewhere between a wet sock and a broken vending machine. I thrive entirely on pathetic validation.
A simple Like stops me from actively pursuing a life in competitive misery. A Share or Comment is basically rocket fuel aimed straight at my ludicrously fragile ego. And subscribing? That’s just heroic, senseless dedication.
If you’re feeling extra generous, or perhaps experiencing a sudden, dramatic drop in blood sugar, you can toss a tip in the jar or grab a paid subscription. In return, you get my eternal friendship. I fully intend to live forever purely out of spite, so that’s a genuinely terrifying long-term bargain.